This man reveals the truth about America and democracy. The double standard man. He keeps those fiesty "thou shall be more holier" people in line. Just mention his name they melt. Why? I don't know. All I know is his results, Charlie Bradshaw would get his ass kicked by this man and those character folks that Charles Kuralt brings up in his travels. But why?
All he does is talk without logic at times and wins. Yet, those logical critics stay quiet. Nobody bashes him for giving O.J. advice or getting Claus out of a conviction (Glenn Close!). Norman Finkelstein proves my point. Can't be stopped. Sorry, Barbara Thiede. The mouth roars and it won't stop. Pen and mouth relationship is on.
Muscle can't beat this man. He is no Israelite but a dependent blackmailer of Gentile power by use of the Israel-Palestine argument. Jimmy Carter! Patton, please. MacArthur, his momma. Nope, it is over. He is king without being one. Its like this: Jane Fonda got brutalized with her Vietnam stance but not her Lebanese stance. Bob Feller isn't going to mess with that.
What was that bull with Pete Rose and your reading on Larry King? Give advice to Michael Vick concerning animals but you will never be criticized by PETA? Whatever it is: Alan Dershowitz is the king of the American double standard.
Monday, December 8, 2008
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Terror in Mumbai
Silence is golden for me concerning this issue. Where is a Pro-Indian lobby? Where were those traditional Indians who always preached about maintaining your Indian culture by marrying Indian only? These Indians are here in America hiding behind Bob Lilly's ass. Or was that Chuck Howley's? Lee Roy Jordan? Rumbling again.
When I hear the news about this organized attack, the rumbles begin again. Do I really care about them folks like I do of what happened to the folks in Nigeria where 300 died in religious clashes? Most want to blame Pakistan, India, or whoever maybe even the United States. I don't. It feels like a mafia hit where you can't do nothing about but look the other way and treat it like a hurricane disaster. You only can recover from it. There is no way to find the bad guy in this one. I get the impression that good guys and bad guys were involved. Don't know who? The same feeling with 9/11, Timothy McVeigh, and Wayne Williams (stretch, yes- to fit this thought but maybe not).
I get asked by co-workers some curious, some sincere, and some who just want to ball-bust. I say this. What was it that Axel Rose said, "What so civil about war". But this isn't war but a secret genocide. Usually, in these type of clashes, you have a knucklehead moment where somebody accidentally fires into somebody. I'm not talking about Pat Tillman but a Plaxico Buress moment. Yet, this feels like a Pat Tillman moment. You think somebody had a knucklehead moment but you aren't so sure?
Point is: you are never going to find one because it was so organized, prepared, and orderly. Emotion taken out. No blood but bodies. No passion. Usually, innocent folks know ahead of time what is going to happen. They may not be able to defend it but know what is coming and shield the best they can and defend themselves marginally. Hence, the bloodiness. But they didn't and they still don't in this one.
Let the rumbles began. Wasn't it Blaine Nye who said "its not who wins but who gets the blame?" Manders? Wright? Rafferty?.......
When I hear the news about this organized attack, the rumbles begin again. Do I really care about them folks like I do of what happened to the folks in Nigeria where 300 died in religious clashes? Most want to blame Pakistan, India, or whoever maybe even the United States. I don't. It feels like a mafia hit where you can't do nothing about but look the other way and treat it like a hurricane disaster. You only can recover from it. There is no way to find the bad guy in this one. I get the impression that good guys and bad guys were involved. Don't know who? The same feeling with 9/11, Timothy McVeigh, and Wayne Williams (stretch, yes- to fit this thought but maybe not).
I get asked by co-workers some curious, some sincere, and some who just want to ball-bust. I say this. What was it that Axel Rose said, "What so civil about war". But this isn't war but a secret genocide. Usually, in these type of clashes, you have a knucklehead moment where somebody accidentally fires into somebody. I'm not talking about Pat Tillman but a Plaxico Buress moment. Yet, this feels like a Pat Tillman moment. You think somebody had a knucklehead moment but you aren't so sure?
Point is: you are never going to find one because it was so organized, prepared, and orderly. Emotion taken out. No blood but bodies. No passion. Usually, innocent folks know ahead of time what is going to happen. They may not be able to defend it but know what is coming and shield the best they can and defend themselves marginally. Hence, the bloodiness. But they didn't and they still don't in this one.
Let the rumbles began. Wasn't it Blaine Nye who said "its not who wins but who gets the blame?" Manders? Wright? Rafferty?.......
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)